RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2011, 06:26 AM
Fusilier Fusilier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bangkok (I'm Canadian)
Posts: 568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
This will release one hell of a lot of radioactive material into the atmosphere and end up as fallout. It's this which is what all the techs etc are most afraid of - a blast would devastate the local (relatively) area but fallout will reach the world.
Probably not. A lot of heat is required for any radiation to be carried into the atmosphere - and there isn't any or likely to be any in this situation.

If it doesn't get under control, the serious effects will most likely be a very localized problem. This won't be another Chernobyl.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-17-2011, 07:28 AM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fusilier View Post
Probably not. A lot of heat is required for any radiation to be carried into the atmosphere - and there isn't any or likely to be any in this situation.

If it doesn't get under control, the serious effects will most likely be a very localized problem. This won't be another Chernobyl.
That is correct. The Chernobyl reactors were a very different design to the Fukushima reactors. The biggest problems with Chernobyl as far as fallout was concerned were that Chernobyl's containment structures were not multi-layered and were pathetic; also Chernobyl used graphite control rods and it was those burning that carried such huge amounts of radioactive fallout into the atmosphere. A full-blown meltdown at Fukushima will heavily irradiate the site but airborne fallout will be much less severe and in any case will probably be blown out over the Pacific.

I'm very concerned about contamination of that coastline however. Much of that sea water they're pouring into the reactors is probably ending up back in the ocean, nastily irradiated.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-17-2011, 07:33 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Targan View Post
Much of that sea water they're pouring into the reactors is probably ending up back in the ocean, nastily irradiated.
That thought had entered my mind as well when I first heard they were using sea water as emergency coolant. Mind you, a little radioactive water introduced into the ocean isn't likely to be a major concern when you think about the probable consequences of not using the water.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.