2nd Marine Division - Norther Poland

[Legbreaker]

That is a very valid opinion you have there Web and ties in with a lot of what I've said on the subject.
Even ignoring population demographics, coal deposits, surviving industry etc, Nato holding the Baltic coastline is a MASSIVE advantage over the Pact, both for continuing war efforts (if any) and peace, well, I can't exactly say negotiations given there's no governments left to do it.
To me, holding the Baltic coastline is the key to long term security. The sea in 2000 is an almost unassailable transportation route given the virtually non-existant aviation assets in the world, not to mention almost total lack of effective naval forces (lets face it, a freighter with a 20mm AA gun could probably fight off the best either side has to play with except on a bad day).
Given this, it's no surprise the gamble was taken, nor that the Pact practically battered itself to pieces to prevent it happening.
Spring 2000 both sides still had significant offensive capability, by autumn this was completely gone - on both sides of the fence.

[Raellus]

Here's my take on the 2nd MarDiv's role in the XI Corps summer offensive:

http://forum.juhlin.com/showthread.p...baltic+marines

[LAW0306]

Give me a chance here leg. Last time I presented a History and order of Battle for Marines( add to RFD source book 2007)...Frank Frey said it was now considered Cannon by him. It will make sense trust me on this. Might add a flavor that you might like.