![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Its always caught my eye, but yes: A special purpose weapon for very limited circumstances.
But then, you've always got those crazy (but fun) russians: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOoUV...er_profilepage
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() You should see this....Russians using the AS VAL rifle (a rather interesting weapon IMO) to shoot down icicles! ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS2MEN-C31U
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear." — David Drake |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A man with a VERY fun pastime! :P
Gotta love it!
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That guys collection is mindboggling. At first he was using other peoples weapons, but now days his personal armory is getting out of hand from what I have been hearing.
After all, not just anyone has a fully operational battle sta.. err.. 40mm Bofors tucked away in the garage. ![]()
__________________
Member of the Bofors fan club! The M1911 of automatic cannon. Proud fan(atic) of the CV90 Series. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
"I am a professional Russian." ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The AA-12 has one very big issue that I think is probably the main reason it hasn't been adopted in any significant numbers.
The magazine is heavy and it doesn't get a lot of support from the magazine well/magazine catch. That 'frame' looking thing that encloses the pistolgrip is actually the magazine support. You have to thread the mag onto that before you can slide it up into the mag well. Did you notice how in the filmclips they never seem to be in any real hurry to change a mag? Imagine trying to do that with cold hands, in the mud and rain and at night. As for the claim that it doesn't need cleaning or lubricating, yes you did hear it right. I paid particular attention to this weapon after hearing the new company make that claim. They are wrong, plain and simple, but it's all part of their publicity hype. They paid big money for the rights to the AA-12 and to update it and they were desperate to recover their costs. This also had them claiming it was the world's deadliest shotgun - not in the middle of a fumbled mag change it ain't... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Fix the mag issues and it could be a pretty damn good weapon...
Another small issue is the huge size of the drum mags. Most of the volume is basically wasted space. Three 10 round mags look like they are more compact than one drum which is a big issue for soldiers when they've got limited space in their webbing.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
How is that relevant to the topic of this thread, the AA-12 besides being a shotgun?
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I always roll my eyes when I hear the "dosen't need to be cleaned or lubricated" fairytale. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It means the AA-12 is a gimic. Pro's use M590's or 870P's if you want a pump and some type of benenlli is you want a semi auto. AA-12 is a munchkin mall ninja gun.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What it means is that is nothing more than your opinion and based on the limited selection of weapons you personally have used.
Can you honestly say you've ever even touched an AA-12, SPAS-15, HK-512, TOZ-194, RO-5? I think not.... I know I haven't handled more than four shotguns in my entire life and that certainly doesn't make me an expert on weapons I havent' even laid eyes on outside of the internet. I for one am willing to take all designs on face value, apply some logic, and listen to the reports form those who actually have used the things before dismissing them out of hand in favour of the one weapon which was issued to me by the military and which just so happens to fit a fairly rigid set of parameters/political expediancy.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh good god, not again with you two...
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But onto the topic. The USAS-12 is an example of where the design concepts behind the AA-12 got it partly right. Both shotguns are the result of Max Atchisson's desire to increase shotgun firepower and while the USAS-12 is only broadly based on Atchisson's original AA-12, they at least managed to get away from the bad mag support/mag catch design of that weapon. Like you, I am still surprised however, that they didn't put a proper magazine well on the weapon. I imagine it was to make the drums easier to manufacture or fit to the weapon or something like that but when you've got a 20-rd drum of 12g attached to the weapon, I would have liked to see a proper magazine well to support the mag rather than the truncated well they went with. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi new guy here. While I have opinions about the AA-12. I think I will stay away from that flame war.
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|