RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-26-2011, 10:44 AM
James Langham James Langham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 735
Default A few more thoughts

Quote:
Originally Posted by simonmark6 View Post
Lovely write up again, James, thanks for sharing. I may have missed it when I was reading, but it might be nice to have a rational as to why the Polish were placed into one regiment rather than being absorbed into INTEL and shared out amongst the Recon units in Poland itself.

The SAS unit made up of Poles makes perfect sense, they'll be behind lines and all need to speak the lingo. It might be something like the fact that HM Gov wanted the propaganda coup of having a "Polish" unit fighting for the West (similar to the British SS unit in WW2). Initial theory might have said that the unit would never be deployed on Polish soil for fear of retribution (this would obviously collapse when the fighting got desperate).
Thanks for the comments, always useful to have feedback.

A fair number of British Poles would be in Military Intelligence (there is a note that a number who failed selection for 27 SAS were so used) but I will expand this to make it clearer.

I actually see the unit clamoring to fight in Poland and the Polish Government in exile will be pushing for this.

Bear in mind that few if any will have actually ever been to Poland so the local knowledge and slang, etc will be missing making them harder to fit in as Poles when speaking to locals (although they could probably pass amongst other Pact troops).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-26-2011, 12:55 PM
simonmark6 simonmark6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Swansea, South Wales, UK
Posts: 374
Default

I could absolutely see the unit being eager to fight in the Old Country but I think the government would be initially reluctant for PR purposes. There will be worries about what would happen to them if captured etc.

This would explain why they were deployed so late to the Polish Theatre.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-26-2011, 01:27 PM
James Langham James Langham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 735
Default Expanded version

Again feedback welcome.

Simon - hope this makes things a little clearer.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Polish Rifle Regiment - 26-12-11.pdf (168.1 KB, 116 views)

Last edited by James Langham; 12-26-2011 at 01:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2011, 06:47 PM
Louied Louied is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 244
Default

Hey James,

Great write up, just a suggestion for the last paragraph. By being renamed "The King's...." makes it a royal regiment (for instance the old King's Regiment was a royal regiment along with The Queen's Regiment. Just prior to the recent FAS there was much talk of The Highlanders (Seaforths, Gordons, and Camerons) being renamed as one of its constituent regiments,The Queen's Own Highlanders (Seaforths and Camerons), was royal). So perhaps they were told by the Army Dress Committee to remove the crown and when King Charles heard this he bestowed the "King's" title to thwart them ??? (it has happened before with a reigning sovereign).

My two cents.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2011, 10:41 AM
James Langham James Langham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 735
Default Third version

Updated again.

Louisd -thanks for the idea.
Attached Images
File Type: pdf Polish Rifle Regiment - 27-12-11.pdf (193.5 KB, 126 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.