RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-21-2012, 04:29 AM
Mahatatain Mahatatain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK, near Maidstone in Kent
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
1984:
Margaret Thatcher follows Reagan's anti-communist stance which leads to tension between the UK and France as the French government pursues a conciliation policy between east and west.
This timeline is really good but, just to be slightly picky on one point, I think that you could describe Thatcher as anti-communist prior to 1984 as she had already been called the Iron Lady by the Soviets prior to that. I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source on some things but according to them it was first coined for Thatcher by military journalist Captain Yuri Gavrilov in the Soviet newspaper Red Star on 24 January 1976 because of her staunch opposition to the Soviet Union and communism.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2012, 12:37 PM
95th Rifleman 95th Rifleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mahatatain View Post
This timeline is really good but, just to be slightly picky on one point, I think that you could describe Thatcher as anti-communist prior to 1984 as she had already been called the Iron Lady by the Soviets prior to that. I know Wikipedia isn't the most reliable source on some things but according to them it was first coined for Thatcher by military journalist Captain Yuri Gavrilov in the Soviet newspaper Red Star on 24 January 1976 because of her staunch opposition to the Soviet Union and communism.
Maggie is a heroine of mine and I've sudied her history. I referred to her in the 1984 section not to indicate the start of her anti-communist stance but to indicate that stance begins to cause problems with France, setting up their eventual withdrawal from NATO. looking at it again I see how it comes across, wil edit it.
__________________
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2012, 02:16 PM
Mahatatain Mahatatain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK, near Maidstone in Kent
Posts: 347
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
Maggie is a heroine of mine and I've sudied her history. I referred to her in the 1984 section not to indicate the start of her anti-communist stance but to indicate that stance begins to cause problems with France, setting up their eventual withdrawal from NATO. looking at it again I see how it comes across, wil edit it.
Ah - that makes sense and it come across more clearly now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:06 PM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 95th Rifleman View Post
Maggie is a heroine of mine [...].
And mine. (She & President Reagan are my heroes from the 80s when it comes to matters political)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2012, 03:28 PM
B.T.'s Avatar
B.T. B.T. is offline
Registered Kraut
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ruhrgebiet, Germany
Posts: 271
Default

Hi 95th Rifleman,
what you came up with, sounds good. My FtF group plays only on very few occasions, so it will last for years, to play through Poland in 2000. But I'd like to try a 90ies based campaign, with a similar (or the same) background, like yours.
Just out of curiousity: Would'nt the Iran-Contra affair fit nicely in your background (maybe not as it really happened, but parts of the plans, like the selling of TOWs to Iranian separatists, would make sense.).
__________________
I'm from Germany ... PM me, if I was not correct. I don't want to upset anyone!

"IT'S A FREAKIN GAME, PEOPLE!"; Weswood, 5-12-2012
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2012, 08:53 PM
Jason Weiser's Avatar
Jason Weiser Jason Weiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 455
Default

My only comment, I don't see Gorbachev making such a statement. By '86 or so, he and Reagan were having competing charm offensives. My thinking is, after Chernenko dies in 1985, he names Viktor Chebrikov to the top slot...and he begins to make things worse instead of better. In fact, say your Chinese general is a KGB asset. He's there mostly to pass intel on the PLA, but well, some bright boy at Moscow Center decides, why not embarrass the Chinese, let's have this guy arrange some small raid to let the KGB Border Guards defeat and have some bodies to display for the Western press. A sort of Gilwitz by proxy...only, something goes very wrong, and matters get WAY out of hand before our guy can stop it. By the time either army's high command is aware of what's going on, you have division sized formations going hammer and tongs with each other 10km deep in China.....
__________________
Author of "Distant Winds of a Forgotten World" available now as part of the Cannon Publishing Military Sci-Fi / Fantasy Anthology: Spring 2019 (Cannon Publishing Military Anthology Book 1)

"Red Star, Burning Streets" by Cavalier Books, 2020

https://epochxp.tumblr.com/ - EpochXperience - Contributing Blogger since October 2020. (A Division of SJR Consulting).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-21-2012, 10:54 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

Jason, it's nice to see you slumming a bit again.
__________________
"We're not innovating. We're selectively imitating." June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2012, 04:02 AM
95th Rifleman 95th Rifleman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 412
Default

I'm a bit blown away by the support and positive comments regarding this project. It means allot to me to have such positive peer review and critique.

I'm going to work on fleshing out other details beyond what I've done for my gaming group, TO&E's, that sort of thing.

One thing was considering (as a possible what if) is the idea that nuclear exchanges never happened and the war became a meat grinding stalemate across the middle of Poland. NATO and WP forces where fairly balanced in the mid-80's and if the fear of MAD drove respective militaries to pursue conventional solutions, they war could of dragged on for a decade.
__________________
Better to reign in hell, than to serve in heaven.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.