RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-26-2012, 10:44 PM
DigTw0Grav3s DigTw0Grav3s is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 57
Default

Everything I've seen points to navalized Sukhois for the PLAN's new carrier. Terribly heavy plane for the kind of distances they'll be concerning themselves with. I would think they'd be better off with a bunch of MiGs.. but what do I know?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:25 PM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DigTw0Grav3s View Post
Everything I've seen points to navalized Sukhois for the PLAN's new carrier. Terribly heavy plane for the kind of distances they'll be concerning themselves with. I would think they'd be better off with a bunch of MiGs.. but what do I know?
It's hard to say what the PLAN is thinking about for their carrier fleet. The fleet carrier niche already has a robust and mature player. If I were a senior staffer in PLAN, I'd point out that toe-to-toe fighting with the Americans isn't going to get good results until the PLAN grows and matures a bit more. In the interim, the PLAN naval air doctrine has to reflect a modus operendi distinctly different from the American naval air doctrine. I don't know enough about the technical details of naval aviation to make recommendations to PLAN. I do know that we might be able to glean something of their concept of use from the composition of the air wing they put aboard their carriers.
__________________
"We're not innovating. We're selectively imitating." June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:29 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,764
Default

From what I've read, China's new carrier doesn't currently have any fighters assigned to it. China's fixed wing naval aviation is still very much in a training and evaluation phase.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2012, 12:01 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Who knows, maybe they'll use it to transport helicopters and vehicles until their fixed wing elements get up to speed? A little like the Australians did with HMAS Sydney during the 1960's.
At least that way the naval crew can get a bit of hands on practise with at least part of their craft...
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:20 PM
LAW0306's Avatar
LAW0306 LAW0306 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 154
Default

I would worry about OHIO Class SSGN's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_class_submarine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2012, 09:59 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAW0306 View Post
I would worry about OHIO Class SSGN's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_class_submarine
Absolutely. IMHO the Ohio SSGN conversions are proof positive that the US military is very capable of modifying doctrine and platforms to suit changing geo-political circumstances.
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:05 PM
HorseSoldier HorseSoldier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 846
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
It's hard to say what the PLAN is thinking about for their carrier fleet. The fleet carrier niche already has a robust and mature player. If I were a senior staffer in PLAN, I'd point out that toe-to-toe fighting with the Americans isn't going to get good results until the PLAN grows and matures a bit more. In the interim, the PLAN naval air doctrine has to reflect a modus operendi distinctly different from the American naval air doctrine. I don't know enough about the technical details of naval aviation to make recommendations to PLAN. I do know that we might be able to glean something of their concept of use from the composition of the air wing they put aboard their carriers.
India and China are developing as regional powers that are concerned about each other, relatively unrelated to China/US issues. Both are developing stronger fleets in general, and carrier capabilities as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2012, 03:00 AM
headquarters's Avatar
headquarters headquarters is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Norways weather beaten coasts
Posts: 1,825
Default Chinese interests

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorseSoldier View Post
India and China are developing as regional powers that are concerned about each other, relatively unrelated to China/US issues. Both are developing stronger fleets in general, and carrier capabilities as well.
I think one should bear in mind that China has interest in many overseas location - for instance Africa. With the number of people based abroad and the major investments made I do not think it far fetched that China would want the capacity to be able to make air strikes and land limited forces to evacuate personel etc.

And as Horsesoldier said - China has to compete with India,Vietnam and Japan among others.

Taking on the US seems a like a bad idea for the Chinese leadership.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-30-2012, 09:56 AM
Sith's Avatar
Sith Sith is offline
Registered Amuser
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 70
Default

At this point there is no air wing assigned to the Chinese carrier. There are a only few planes there to train the crew on deck operations.

You have to remember that the US has about 70 years of carrier operations experience and India has about 40 or 50. The Chinese are only now starting to get their toes wet with this kind of thing. Their carrier looks inpressive right now, but that's about all it is.
__________________
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.