RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-02-2013, 05:59 PM
Targan's Avatar
Targan Targan is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 3,757
Default

Not a nice clean list but I think most of the info is there for Australian Army roles: http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/army/
__________________
"It is better to be feared than loved" - Nicolo Machiavelli
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-02-2013, 06:15 PM
Tegyrius's Avatar
Tegyrius Tegyrius is offline
This Sourcebook Kills Fascists
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 914
Default

Awesome. Thank you, gentlemen!

- C.
__________________
Clayton A. Oliver • Occasional RPG Freelancer Since 1996

Author of The Pacific Northwest, coauthor of Tara Romaneasca, creator of several other free Twilight: 2000 and Twilight: 2013 resources, and curator of an intermittent gaming blog.

It rarely takes more than a page to recognize that you're in the presence of someone who can write, but it only takes a sentence to know you're dealing with someone who can't.
- Josh Olson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-02-2013, 07:15 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

I reckon it's going to be a case of matching the broad MOS to the Australian Army job description. This is all pretty much from memory so hopefully Targan and Legbreaker can fill the holes and correct my faults.

We were patterned on the British Army system and so before the 2000s we didn't use an MOS style listing system as such. I don't think anything has changed in that regard.
The Australian system works via "Roles/Employment" and "Qualifications" and they tend to be less about specialization than the US system is and more about cross-training. Within those Roles, you may have one to several "Tasks".
For example, soldiers in an Infantry Platoon are all expected to know how to operate and maintain every weapon used within the Platoon, so even the most junior Private* should be able to take on the Task of machine gunner or grenadier if necessary. So that Private may be Roled as an Infantryman but Tasked as a rifleman and then a machine gunner and then back to a rifleman as the Section Leader needs.
* assuming he's done his Initial Employment Training for Infantry

These Roles and Qualifications are not linked directly to Rank for the most part but they do increase your pay level.
I don't think anything has changed much, just the general structure of the operating units.
We also don't have the OR/NCO Rank breakdowns that the US does, in the main you're either (for example) a Private or a senior Private, Sergeant or senior Sergeant etc. etc. with whatever Role, Qualifications and Tasks you may have. Rank is also not as much of an indicator of how long you have served compared to the US system. For example, a Private with several years of service may have all the qualifications for promotion to Corporal but if there are no Corporal positions available within his unit, he will not get the promotion but he will be in line when a slot becomes available. But for all that time he will be a Private, a senior Private for sure but other than that there's no other distinctions made.

By way of an example, at one point when I was in, my Employment/Role was "soldier"** in an Infantry Platoon and I was a Qualified infantry soldier with additional Qualifications as assault trooper and SFMG although through that time I was Tasked as scout, senior scout, rifle group leader, machine gunner and finally gun group leader.

A little clarification is in order for that part;
Squad equivalent in the Australian Army is the Section.
An Infantry Section from about the 1960s but prior to the 2000s consisted of approximately 10 soldiers broken down into the following groups: -
Scout/Command -two scouts (Privates) and the Section Leader (usually a Corporal)
Gun group - machine gunner, gunner's assistant, Section 2IC (usually a Lance Corporal)
Rifle group - four soldiers* commanded by a senior Private who was also the grenadier (M79 or M203).
* sometimes three and sometimes five or six depending on the strength of the parent Company and it's role.

Edit: 4th Dec 2013
** Going back through some of my notebooks from back in the day, the Employment/Role was "Rifleman" and not simply the generic "soldier"

Last edited by StainlessSteelCynic; 12-04-2013 at 06:36 AM. Reason: Updating
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-02-2013, 08:21 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

This could lead to (more) PC Generation rules that are specific to countries.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.