![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally, I don't consider the v1 timeline very illogical -- it's far better than v2 and v2.2 -- but I think the designers were trying to come with something to take into account recent events (at the time), bring the timeline up to date -- and failed the logic test.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm struggling with a very similar scenario in my T2030 work vis-à-vis China. As a kid, I couldn't have imagined the U.S. pulling such a dick move as a first strike but now, as a much better informed adult, I have to admit that the possibility is, given the circumstances, actually somewhat plausible.
I've long banged the drum for the principle that the T2K universe is actually more of a multiverse. So, if you, as the GM/world builder, prefer your scenario to the original, go with it. If my opinion counts for anything, as I mentioned above, I think your scenario has merit.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|