OPSEC (Split from Mission)

[TiggerCCW UK]

Duck and cover!

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by TiggerCCW UK

Duck and cover!

Why?

[headquarters]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Why?

you mean to say that you dont pick up on the LAW vs Twilight 2013 situation at all??


?

?

Well then , lets just say that law can be pretty harsh/come across in a certain way in some of his replies -and I would say you commenting on his breach of opsec is along the same line of communicating .

I prefer friendly - or at least neutral tone in the correspondance -but hey - thats just me.

Maybe kato needs to make another seperate thread so that discussion between the two of you can be contained.

yes-I predict that there will be a word-fight .

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by headquarters

you mean to say that you dont pick up on the LAW vs Twilight 2013 situation at all??


?

?

Well then , lets just say that law can be pretty harsh/come across in a certain way in some of his replies -and I would say you commenting on his breach of opsec is along the same line of communicating .

I prefer friendly - or at least neutral tone in the correspondance -but hey - thats just me.

Maybe kato needs to make another seperate thread so that discussion between the two of you can be contained.

yes-I predict that there will be a word-fight .

Yes. I am aware of it. Even in the six hours I've been registered here.

There shouldn't be any issue. What he said breached OPSEC. Pure and simple. I gave concrete examples of the information that I pulled from his breach of it. That's not a lot of information for you or me, but combined with the website link he posted, I now know enough to get his full name, his commander's name, and a plethora of other information if I wanted to.

He shouldn't get butt-hurt about it, and if you do, Law, then you know Schofield is about 20 miles from K-Bay, come see me and we'll talk it out. Otherwise, take it for what it was, an azimuth check on a subject that can be a slippery slope.

Now, the one issue I do have with it, is Law's comment about not having a return date. That's just silly. Every unit that deploys has a date that the deployment will end. It's called a timeline. Now that might get changed, for mine, I redeployed 17 days earlier than what was on my orders, and that may be what he meant by his comment, but to an uninitiated person, that carries a much more dire implication than a BN Staff guy is going to encounter.

[headquarters]

Ok - I see where you coming from .

I guess wishing Law the best of luck on his deployment is in order too.

Originally Posted by Eddie

Yes. I am aware of it. Even in the six hours I've been registered here.

There shouldn't be any issue. What he said breached OPSEC. Pure and simple. I gave concrete examples of the information that I pulled from his breach of it. That's not a lot of information for you or me, but combined with the website link he posted, I now know enough to get his full name, his commander's name, and a plethora of other information if I wanted to.

He shouldn't get butt-hurt about it, and if you do, Law, then you know Schofield is about 20 miles from K-Bay, come see me and we'll talk it out. Otherwise, take it for what it was, an azimuth check on a subject that can be a slippery slope.

Now, the one issue I do have with it, is Law's comment about not having a return date. That's just silly. Every unit that deploys has a date that the deployment will end. It's called a timeline. Now that might get changed, for mine, I redeployed 17 days earlier than what was on my orders, and that may be what he meant by his comment, but to an uninitiated person, that carries a much more dire implication than a BN Staff guy is going to encounter.

[kato13]

Originally Posted by headquarters

Maybe kato needs to make another seperate thread so that discussion between the two of you can be contained.

I am considering giving them their own sub forum . Hopefully that will keep the collateral damage to a minimum.

[headquarters]

Originally Posted by kato13

I am considering giving them their own sub forum . Hopefully that will keep the collateral damage to a minimum.

haha

[General Pain]

Well Law didn't wan't to have anything more to do with me after what I thought was a funny remarc in the old RPGHOST forum. I'm not going to repeat it, cuz some people would probably laugh others get angry....On the other hand I have had no usefull input from him anyway so we will probably stay like that....

But I hope he gets out alive so I can keep reading his amusing post at this fantastic forum.

"Stay Clean Law and Stay Safe"

GP

[LAW0306]

Well Eddie was it a violation? Or did I say things that are open source and backed it up with a site too see open source info? A site too keep my Friends/Family here informed on what I will be doing at a non-secure level(The same site thats here on the net to provide people with information).And yes PM and I will come and see you anytime .This was a post among friends too tell them were I would be for the next few months. Please PM me I would love too drive up there. I'm open any day. Monday I have too come see your brigade anyway so we can have lunch say the O-club at noon?


No need to Duck and cover. I made a promise to Kato too be kind to all here.This was after the flame war here with the 2013 guys. Also He is another Officer and we will talk it out among men.

[TiggerCCW UK]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Why?

I've been on the receiving end of a Law outburst due to a misunderstanding (not worth going over again as its water under the bridge) and its not pretty. Forthright and honest would be one way of describing him.

On a personal note this is a great forum that is mostly free of the flame wars, personal attacks and general unpleasantness that plagues a lot of similar forums due to interweb anonymity and consequence free posting. Hopefully we can keep it that way here. Kato runs a good site that fulfills a lot of my gaming needs until I win the lottery and establish the Twilight Cafe and I'd hate to see it get bogged down in the sort of arseyness that hits so many forums. Basically all I'm saying is lets keep it civil folks, please.