RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2015, 10:55 AM
Webstral's Avatar
Webstral Webstral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North San Francisco Bay
Posts: 1,688
Default

It's interesting that countries which were neutral during the Cold War are now thinking seriously about joining NATO. Very interesting. For Sweden in particular to give up her neutrality would be a sea change in Swedish thinking.
__________________
"We're not innovating. We’re selectively imitating." June Bernstein, Acting President of the University of Arizona in Tucson, November 15, 1998.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2015, 12:35 PM
Schone23666's Avatar
Schone23666 Schone23666 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 440
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
It's interesting that countries which were neutral during the Cold War are now thinking seriously about joining NATO. Very interesting. For Sweden in particular to give up her neutrality would be a sea change in Swedish thinking.
Interesting, and also frightening. Something really has changed in Russia and the overall global equation if they're seriously considering this now.
__________________
"The use of force is always an answer to problems. Whether or not it's a satisfactory answer depends on a number of things, not least the personality of the person making the determination. Force isn't an attractive answer, though. I would not be true to myself or to the people I served with in 1970 if I did not make that realization clear."
- David Drake
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2015, 12:35 PM
Medic's Avatar
Medic Medic is offline
Resident Medic, Crazy Finn
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: In the cold north called Finland
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcaf_777 View Post
Actually the Fins can do this still as the Ottawa Treaty only covers non command anti personel mines, it dose apply to anti tank mines, claymores, the new XM-7 Spider Mines or booby traps

There is also nothing that prevents(Grey Area) thrid party from mining a coutry or storage of land mines by a non signing country.

In in theory the US could have a stockplie of it's own Army equipment (land mine) in Finland. As long as they are under US control the Fins claim could that the treaty is still enforced as it not their stockplie, and they are for use by the US which did not sign the treaty.

The Treat also states that each country can have a "small" number of land mines for training purposes, so have 40,000 no stock for training, that one per regular solider.

In Short there is not a document written by a man that another man can't find a way around.
Well, I do know that, but by removing the non-command detonated mines, the Finnish defense strategy changed completely.

The most useful mine in the Finnish arsenal was the Sakaramiina m/65, made of 60 grams (that's about two ounces for those who don't read metric) of TNT, a detonator and a three pronged pressure plate on top of the detonator. Until 1998, the pressure plate was made of bakelite or plastic and thus made the mine undetectable. The charge was enough to blow a tire or destroy a limb without killing, which was even better for the psychological effect on the enemy. The idea was, with anti-tank mines, one would deploy these smaller mines amongst them as a deterrent, so the enemy would think twice before trying to clear the minefield. Of course, nowadays we need to use a bit more drastic measures and use the Telamiina (Track Mine roughly translated), a 9kg pressed TNT-charge with a plastic center and the exactly same 60 gram charge in the middle with a pressure detonator without the plastic cap on the detonator so the mine will blow from far less pressure. With the cap, one could supposedly hop on the mine, but I would not test that. Without the cap, one steps on it and turns in to a mass of unidentified goo.

Now, I understand what you are suggesting about storing the mines for someone else or having them for training, but that won't fly. If the Finnish politicians are anything, they are far too honest in matters like these and dishonest in things they should be honest in. Perhaps not all of them, but the Finnish politics...well, that's enough about that.

FDF conducted research on the matter and could replace (at least in theory) all the aspects of an infantry mine, save for one - the psychological effect of walking in to a minefield.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webstral View Post
It's interesting that countries which were neutral during the Cold War are now thinking seriously about joining NATO. Very interesting. For Sweden in particular to give up her neutrality would be a sea change in Swedish thinking.
The Swedish thinking has changed quite a bit, especially after that submarine incident. The Swedes dismantled their conscript army and turned it in to a small force of professional soldiers. However, they ran in to a bit of a problem - they could not get enough professional soldiers in to service. They have a Homeguard (Hemvärnet) that is a bunch of volunteers who train once or twice a year as far as I know, but they are at the same type of situation, they were in the beginning of WW2. Back then their pride, the Air Defense Artillery, had ammo for about 17 minutes, after which it would have run dry. There has been talk about the Swedes returning to the good old conscript army soon, though it might be a bit more selective service than in Finland.
__________________
"Listen to me, nugget, and listen good. Don't go poppin' your head out like that, unless you want it shot off. And if you do get it shot off, make sure you're dead, because if you ain't, guess who's gotta drag your sorry ass off the field? Were short on everything, so the only painkiller I have comes in 9mm doses. Now get the hell out of my foxhole!" - an unknown medic somewhere, 2013.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.