![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Disclaimer - I do not have any books in front of me - all of this is from memory so I can't quote page numbers etc. Someone that does have the relevant books and cares enough to check can likely verify (or not) the following (Legbreaker?)
I think there is a reference to French Guyana in the V2 NATO vehicle guide. IIRC it mentions that there's a large detachment of Foreign Legion troops providing security for the Space Centre. I don't think it specifically says whether or not said Space Centre is intact or not so each individual would need to draw their own conclusions as to whether a large detachment of Foreign Legion troops would be tasked to provide security for either a) an at least semi functional site or b) a pile of radioactive ruins. I choose to go for A. Quote:
Or a typo.
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Not sure where you looked - this is what I found (with page number) V2.2 NATO Combat Vehicle Handbook, p88 3RD FOREIGN LEGION INFANTRY REGIMENT (REI) Subordination: Latin American Regional Command Current Location: Kourou Manpower: 350 (Emphasis mine) Kourou is the location of the Guiana Space Centre V2.2 NATO Combat Vehicle Handbook, p88 9TH MARINE INFANTRY BATTALION (BIM) Subordination: Latin American Regional Command Current Location: Cayenne Manpower: 450 (Emphasis mine) Cayenne is the capital of French Guiana So there is a large contingent of Foreign Legion troops in the vicinity of the site of the Guiana Space Centre and another large contingent of French troops in the capital of French Guiana.. I was mistaken about their purpose being stated - it's not. I got that from here http://www.oocities.org/littlegreenm...T2K_France.htm And then there's this from wikipedia Quote:
So I'll stick with option A.
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Missed on the spelling.
Oh well, we've learnt something.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
The other units in the command also appear to have suffered very heavily. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9th_Ma...antry_Regiment https://translate.google.com.au/tran...es&prev=search
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So once again, up to each individual to interpret the material as they wish - I am not seeing anything written down in a published source that definitively confirms whether the Guiana Space Center is operational or not.
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While it is possible troops were withdrawn, that's still a pretty big reduction. The 33rd for example is down to about 25% and they apparently have the largest area to cover (French speakers/readers please correct me if I'm wrong - google translate is only so good).
I like to look at it more like the launch facility was attacked in some manner and the 3rd was either caught in the blast/fallout, or was downwind and suffered casualties from toxic chemicals when the rocket fuel went up (or something along those lines). Troops from the other two units were reassigned to make up some of the losses. It's equally possible troops were lost in conventional operations against local forces, desertion, disease, starvation, or any number of other causes. Regardless of any of the above, it's extremely unlikely the French are going to be allowing anybody else to a) use the facility, no matter what condition it's in, or b) have access to any satellites they may happen to have in operation for any reason. In post 2000 good communications would be vital to controlling what's left of the worlds resources. Maintaining a monopoly on this would ensure France's leading position in global matters for decades to come.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives. Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect" Mors ante pudorem |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hmm, that certainly does suggest that either the space launch facility is intact, or there's enough left that the French think it's worth protecting with a considerable investment of manpower.
__________________
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|