RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Morrow Project/ Project Phoenix Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2016, 11:04 AM
mmartin798 mmartin798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 667
Default Unusual target choices

I just finished placing all the US warhead locations as listed in the 4th edition, along with all the Canadian targets that were visible on the map I used. I found a couple that I thought were odd choices and wondered if there anyone had a reasonable justification for them other than the warhead needed to go someplace and this was in range.

The first is a dam in Michigan. It is not too far south of a nuclear power plant. That is important to note. The way this dam works is it uses power generated by the reactor overnight to run the turbines backwards to fill a man-made pond with water from Lake Michigan. Then during the day, water is let out of the pond to generate power at the dam to even out the peak electricity demands upon the nuclear reactor. So basically a big battery. If the dam was left alone, it would generate power for maybe 3-4 days and then stop working.

The second is the decommissioned Stanley R Mickelsen Safeguard Complex in North Dakota for the ABM system allowed under the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. This site came online in 1 April 1975, fully operational 28 September 1975 and deactivated 10 February 1976. Satellite pictures show the pylon that held the phased radar array empty, the roads around it in disrepair as well as a few buildings.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-21-2016, 11:14 AM
mmartin798 mmartin798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 667
Default

The ND target might just be off. There is an active early detection radar site about 38 km WSW of the Mickelsen complex. That would make sense.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2016, 04:23 PM
Jason Weiser's Avatar
Jason Weiser Jason Weiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 455
Default

I think it is a case that the original target list was written in the 1980s and not much has changed between it and the new 4th ed target list...hell, I would go so far as to say the list is verbatim.
__________________
Author of "Distant Winds of a Forgotten World" available now as part of the Cannon Publishing Military Sci-Fi / Fantasy Anthology: Spring 2019 (Cannon Publishing Military Anthology Book 1)

"Red Star, Burning Streets" by Cavalier Books, 2020

https://epochxp.tumblr.com/ - EpochXperience - Contributing Blogger since October 2020. (A Division of SJR Consulting).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2016, 07:52 PM
nuke11 nuke11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmartin798 View Post
The ND target might just be off. There is an active early detection radar site about 38 km WSW of the Mickelsen complex. That would make sense.
It may be more practical for Cavalier Air Force Station. The PARCS radar station there can pick up an object about 24 cm in size at about 3200 km and it is pointed in the general direction that missiles travelling from Russia as well.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2016, 12:40 AM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Weiser View Post
I think it is a case that the original target list was written in the 1980s and not much has changed between it and the new 4th ed target list...hell, I would go so far as to say the list is verbatim.
Hello Jason,

There was some discussion of this list on another Morrow Project list. I believe the list is a verbatim copy of the old list but then new targets were added into the mix, along with Chinese weapons that were not used in the original list. It's obvious a lot of thought and effort went into the new edition but for some reason no one thought to do a quick internet search on the actual site.

Most likely the Michigan hydroelectric dam was a case of the original authors probably working off a list without knowing exactly how that particular plant worked, of course it's not like they could Google it!

As for the Safeguard site, the original authors were working off old material and perhaps didn't even know it had been deactivated. Or else they thought that it might be reactivated some time between 1979-80 when the game was written and the date of the war, the far-off 1989.

One site I can see as being a little odd is Chiliwack BC. It would make sense to nuke this location in 1989 as this was when a Canadian Forces Base was present. Since the end of the Cold War the base was partially deactivated, although there is still a Militia (Reserve Force) unit based there, as well as extensive police training facilities. In 4th edition it's listed as an "major agricultural area" which is technically true but seems like a waste of a warhead when there are several refineries and terminals that would otherwise be left intact.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2016, 03:02 PM
mmartin798 mmartin798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuke11 View Post
It may be more practical for Cavalier Air Force Station. The PARCS radar station there can pick up an object about 24 cm in size at about 3200 km and it is pointed in the general direction that missiles travelling from Russia as well.
That is precisely the site I was referencing as a better choice.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2016, 11:30 AM
nuke11 nuke11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 310
Default

Can you send a copy of the map you created? Always looking for new maps people use for the target list.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2016, 04:33 PM
mmartin798 mmartin798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 667
Default

Here is a link to the map.

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resi...nt=photo%2cjpg

The purple circles are airburst warheads and the red are surface warheads. The size of the circles are the limit of the 1 PSI overpressure radius. All the circles are transparent, giving overlapping impact areas a more opaque appearance. All targets are as listed in the 4th edition rulebook.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2016, 06:03 PM
nuke11 nuke11 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mmartin798 View Post
Here is a link to the map.

https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resi...nt=photo%2cjpg

The purple circles are airburst warheads and the red are surface warheads. The size of the circles are the limit of the 1 PSI overpressure radius. All the circles are transparent, giving overlapping impact areas a more opaque appearance. All targets are as listed in the 4th edition rulebook.
Thank you. It seems a lot of people use that map as there base.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2016, 06:45 PM
mmartin798 mmartin798 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 667
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuke11 View Post
Thank you. It seems a lot of people use that map as there base.
Seeing as it is free and has a generous reuse policy, I am not surprised.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2016, 11:25 AM
ArmySGT.'s Avatar
ArmySGT. ArmySGT. is offline
Internet Intellectual
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,412
Default

The answer for one is......... the author received a speeding ticket in that little hamlet. Per PD notes in the module.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-02-2016, 03:38 PM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmySGT. View Post
The answer for one is......... the author received a speeding ticket in that little hamlet. Per PD notes in the module.
Nope, never did that, totally innocent...thought never crossed my pea-picking mind! LOL
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-2016, 11:53 AM
WallShadow's Avatar
WallShadow WallShadow is offline
Ephemera of the Big Ka-Boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: near TMI
Posts: 574
Default

As an aside, once when bored I pulled up NukeMap and wrote my name in TsarBomba's (100 MT) across the Midwest/Northeast. It's possible that No Such Agency or the Chronically Inquisitive Americans may have perked up at that, but, hey, what good's the most powerful nuke on the planet if you can't be artistic with it?
__________________
"Let's roll." Todd Beamer, aboard United Flight 93 over western Pennsylvania, September 11, 2001.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-04-2016, 12:17 PM
dragoon500ly dragoon500ly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East Tennessee, USA
Posts: 2,894
Default

LOL! And here I thought I was the only one that that "indulged" in such targeting! All well just gives the boys and girls at Fart, Barf and Itch something to put in their little black books...
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.