The Rock Island Arsenal

[unkated]

Originally Posted by kato13

For an alternate timeline I am trying to come up with a Logical reason for closing the Rock Island Arsenal during one of the rounds of BRAC (I want to have it be transformed into a private development like the Glenview NAS and Fort Sheridan were.) These would be closed in a more modern timeline not necessarily a T2k one.

Of course as BRAC is about political maneuvering as much as it is about the logic of defending the nation, It is easy to say it happened. I am wondering about the ramifications though.

I was hoping this group might have opinions on how such a closure might effect the nations defense plans. For example what other bases might take some of the load. How reserve plans might be affected(It is a Reserve HQ if I recall correctly). Any thoughts are welcome.

Some entrepreneur shows a plan (starting with politicians) that the Rock Island Arsenal can run much more efficiently in private hands with military oversight than as a US-gov't run entity. 250 military personnel, 6000 civilian employees - that's 6000 people off the gov't payroll, who can be replaced as soon as someone with a similar skill set and a lower price (salary) and less benefits.

While too expensive to be bought outright, RIA could be leased by the entrepreneur from the US Gov't, cost of the lease used as a credit against the charge for producing military output and R&D work.

In a Merc: 2000 type environment, with reduction of apparent gov't expenditure paramount, It's possible. The Entrepreneur & his working group can also look for graft/selling off stuff left laying around RIA as a bonus...

Uncle Ted

[.45cultist]

Originally Posted by unkated

Some entrepreneur shows a plan (starting with politicians) that the Rock Island Arsenal can run much more efficiently in private hands with military oversight than as a US-gov't run entity. 250 military personnel, 6000 civilian employees - that's 6000 people off the gov't payroll, who can be replaced as soon as someone with a similar skill set and a lower price (salary) and less benefits.

While too expensive to be bought outright, RIA could be leased by the entrepreneur from the US Gov't, cost of the lease used as a credit against the charge for producing military output and R&D work.

In a Merc: 2000 type environment, with reduction of apparent gov't expenditure paramount, It's possible. The Entrepreneur & his working group can also look for graft/selling off stuff left laying around RIA as a bonus...

Uncle Ted

GOCO like Lake City- Govt Owned, Contractor Operated?

[unkated]

Originally Posted by .45cultist

GOCO like Lake City- Govt Owned, Contractor Operated?

Since you made me go and look it up.....

Yes, more or less, but with (hopefully) less governmental oversight as long as the contracted results are produced. (By which I mean that I am presuming there is a decent government oversight in day to day operations of Lake City; for Rock Island scenario, the presumption would be fro lowered government oversight

(We're producing what you want and it is costing the government less; what else do you need to know? )



Lake City itself can be an interesting location for a T2K scenario - if operational, the plant is an asset that would need to be protected - including it's workforce. Who holds Missouri, MilGov or CivGov?

Keeping it operational - or alternatively, shutting it down without destroying it, or an unwelcome visit to its warehouses, could be and interesting piece of campaign. Lots of buildings, lots of space (all mighty flat terrain).

By canon, there are no named strikes against Rock Island or Lake City (or the other similar plants across the country), but cannon includes a number of smaller nukes that may have been used against unnamed targets...

Uncle Ted