RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2017, 12:57 PM
James Langham2 James Langham2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Mansfield, UK
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainbow Six View Post
James, thanks for the namecheck, RN7, thanks for the endorsement - both are appreciated.

FWIW I absolutely agree that using the term 'Royal' to refer to the Army of Scotland was an error on GDW's part. The notion of a Stuart descendant returning to claim the Scottish throne, either of their own accord or at the behest of the SNP, is highly implausible imho - as has been stated, the SNP are Republican in all but name.
You are welcome, I thought it fitted well and has the irony of the Rainbow Warrior...

I agree and I'm working on a reason - considering some sort of agreement perhaps a coalition as with the Lib-Lab government in the game it is possible that the SNP get less support IRL - just musing and open to ideas if others have them.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-26-2017, 01:39 PM
Rainbow Six's Avatar
Rainbow Six Rainbow Six is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,624
Default

The most logical reason I can come up with is not dissimilar to what happened IRL during Indyref 1 in 2014, during which the SNP policy was that in the event that they'd won the referendum and we'd achieved independence we'd have followed the Commonwealth model and Queen Elizabeth would have remained the Head of State. Ultimately it's realpolitik - not all Independence supports are republicans so for the SNP to openly come out as pro Republican was - and still is - deemed likely to cost votes. Probably a lot of votes.

So if the Twilight 2000 SNP are trying to act as a legitimate and democratic Government with one eye to the future then there's a case for using the Royal prefix - I could see the SNP leadership plying this sort of line: 'we've been abandoned by the Government in England so we're doing what's best for Scotland in the meantime but we're still loyal to the King - look, our army is even called the Royal Army!'

In other words, they're declaring independence from His Majesty's (British) Government but not His Majesty, who in addition to being the British Monarch is also head of the Commonwealth, which gives a bit of wiggle room.

But it's a big stretch. As a Scot, I think in a T2k scenario the SNP would declare a Republic in a heartbeat, so I don't buy it personally, but I think it's a lot more realistic than a possible Stuart restoration.
__________________
Author of the unofficial and strictly non canon Alternative Survivor’s Guide to the United Kingdom
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.