![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dragoon,
From about 1989 this is what the Army was looking at (based on my research): Under AOE we are looking at five Corps (three ‘Heavy’, III, V & VII with two ‘Light’ I & XVIII) to fight a “ two & a half war” contingency (Europe, NW Asia, and SW Asia, the half) I haven’t found anything on IX Corps yet other than its rear element in HI supervised RC units in the Pacific Rim and it’s Fwd in Japan functioned as USA Japan. Each Hvy Corp, ideally, would consist of the following: Two Arm Divs Two Mech Divs One Inf Div (now there were two AOE Configuratiions they were looking at for the five ARNG Inf Divs according to Romjue. Each version would have one each Arm, Mech, & AA Bdes but v.1 would have three of each Arm, Mech, & AA Bns along with a TLAT Bn. V.2 (the preferred one) would of had 4x Arm, 3x Mech, & 3x AA) One ACR One ‘Rear Battle’ Inf Bde One Arm Bde One Mech Bde 49 & 50 ADs along with 35 ID seemed to RO the three Hvy Corps. Though 50 AD was having a rough time and so was the 42 ID as it had to recruit a 3rd Bde to replace 27 IB when it became 10th Mtn Div’s RO. To be continued.... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
As for the IX Corps, it was slatted to reinforce Eighth Army in Korea, or as controlling headquarters for Taiwan if the decision was made to reinforce them.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|