![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The scrap aluminum makes more sense. Even though the KFS has reliable energy, it takes a great deal more electricity to make aluminum from bauxite then to recycle scrap aluminum. Why use that much power when the scrap should be rather plentiful.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I imagine scrap metal as a whole would be a huge trade good especially metal that's clean of radioactivity. After all,some of the best 'mine's in the form of old cities got nuked pretty hard and even 150 years later may very well be still be pretty hot.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unless you are in a crater of a surface or subsurface blast, most common metals will not be that radioactive after 150 years. The most likely isotopes activated in iron have a half-life of 2.7 years or less. In copper, the half-lives is measured in hours. With the exception of one very rare isotope of aluminum, the half-lives are measured in second or nanoseconds. While there is going to be some hotter spots, by and large scavenging metal should be safe.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ah ok, for reason I had figured that some hot zones might persist for a long time. Also, are there any nuclear power plants down in Kentucky?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
None in Kentucky. But some in Tennessee, including Oak Ridge.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From 1952-2013 there was the Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant near Paducah, Kentucky that produced low-enriched uranium. But no, not a power plant itself.
|
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|