![]() |
![]() |
|
View Poll Results: Best all around T2K tank option | |||
Abrams: I don't care about logistics and I have plenty of maintenance guys |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 16.98% |
Challenger: Big & Bad but not quite as much hassle as an Abrams |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.87% |
Leopard II: Germany always builds the best |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 22.64% |
T-95 / FST: Yes, it looks stupid but it's the best the Russians have |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.89% |
LeClerc: it's nice to be neutral |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
T-80: ERA is cool |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
T-72: the Sherman of T2K, mediocre tank but there sure are a lot of them |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 11.32% |
M60/M48: My characters are from the National Guard and proud of it |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 7.55% |
Chieftain: "so, how much weight you think that bridge is rated for?" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 3.77% |
Leopard I: hey'at least the armor is spaced. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Centurion: Love it, absolute favorite post WW2 tank, it should win the poll |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 5.66% |
T-62: 50's technology with soviet era build quality are any still running? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
AMX-30: um I can't think of a reason (open to suggestions) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
T-55: Most blown-up tank of the post WW2 period. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.89% |
M-4: Sherman: Keeping it old, old, old school |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 1.89% |
T-34: Better than most 21st century AFVs in the same weight class. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 7.55% |
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The T-34 is cool and all but that 85mm gun is not going to be able to decisively defeat the armor on most tanks you'd be running across in central Europe.
I'm going to go out on a limb and go with a nice, souped-up version of the T-72. This assumes I'm in Poland or thereabouts. Here's why: spare parts and ammo shouldn't be too hard to scrounge. For a tank, it's supposedly pretty low maintainance. The Poles and Soviets (duh) use it so you might be able to sneak around a bit in it, or play Trojan Horse. The T-80, IIRC, is basically a T-72 with a gas-turbine engine- the Soviet's effort to mimic the Abrams without starting from scratch. I didn't pick the T-80 since it, like the Abrams, is a gas guzzler. If spares, and ammo weren't an issue, I would go with the Challenger II or Leopard II. If fuel wasn't an issue either, I would go with the M1A1, hands down.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG: https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048 https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module |
Tags |
ground vehicles, polls, vehicles |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - Sex in an Abrams Tank (Split from The Longer Version Part 11) | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 26 | 06-16-2009 05:43 AM |
Question: Man vs. older tank | Krejcik | Twilight 2000 Forum | 33 | 02-21-2009 07:40 PM |
OT: WWII Pacific Theater Tank battles? | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 0 | 09-10-2008 03:04 AM |
Another interesting tank factoid... | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 0 | 09-10-2008 02:59 AM |
T2013: Thoughts, Opinions, Hopes, & Fears | kato13 | Twilight 2000 Forum | 0 | 09-10-2008 02:46 AM |