RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2015, 09:53 AM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,347
Default Use of a Vehicle in CONUS

I have learned in my research of the Bison MRTV, is that at JRTC employs 12 Bisons and one Bison MRTV. What would be their fate in T2K? JRTC is at Fort Polk; the Mexicans and/or Russians may make a side trip to snap up the US vehicles left there --possibly met by heavy resistance the entire way.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2015, 10:57 AM
Olefin Olefin is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 3,003
Default

I dont think either the Russians or the Mexicans ever made it to Fort Polk - if you read the US Army Guide and where the units based in Louisiana are I am pretty sure that's where they are based - i.e. that the enemy never got there
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2015, 01:12 PM
unkated unkated is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 416
Default

I note that the CDF first began to stock the Bison in 1990. Can you find when the US acquired MRTVs?

Without further data, it seems to me that it would be be a while until...

- Deliveries of MRTV variants would appear, IFVs being sought first
- Once delivered, a few years of use until the CDF praised them highly enough for the US military to look into ethir use and purchase
- Further delay of fighting through the US procurement process.

It seems unlukely to occur before 1996, at which point CDF would be less willing to share factory output - or the US be willing to expend effort retarining on new vehicles if not necessary.

Uncle Ted
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2015, 06:46 PM
StainlessSteelCynic's Avatar
StainlessSteelCynic StainlessSteelCynic is offline
Registered Registrant
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,375
Default

I agree with unkated's assessment but I'd also speculate that such a small number could indicate that they were obtained for trails & assessment probably as a precursor to the US Army's adoption of the Stryker vehicle family, (taken into US service in 2002).
Given that the Cold War is ongoing, the motivation for obtaining the Stryker would not have arisen and if we assume (in the real world) the Bisons were obtained to assess & develop the Stryker Brigade concept, would the US Army actually have motive to acquire the Bison in the T2k world?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2015, 07:30 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,289
Default

I'm all for "exotics" but, as far as I can tell, the Bison isn't a whole lot different that the LAV-25, already in service with the USMC and the T2K-era U.S. Army. Why would the DoD be looking at the Bison when both vehicles are based on the MOWAG Piranha? It's an intriguing mystery.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module

Last edited by Raellus; 09-29-2015 at 09:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2015, 08:54 AM
Olefin Olefin is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 3,003
Default

FYI

Mentioning Fort Polk had me look up some units and where they were located in canon - and realized why the writers used Camp Beauregard as the rally point in LA as opposed to Polk after I looked at some dates.

You would think that the home of the 5th Mechanized Division would have been the better place because the JRTC was there as well. However when you look at the dates the canon was written you can see why the JRTC isnt a factor in what is going on in the canon - it didnt go to Chafee in Arkansas until 1987 (after most of the original canon had been written) and not to Polk until 1993.

However you wonder if the JRTC would have been moved there with the 5th still there. In reality the 5th was deactivated in 1992 and thus the base was available for the JRTC to be moved there.

So given the 5th still being a going concern at the start of the war, would the JRTC still be at Fort Chafee? If so I dont see MilGov or CivGov (i.e. the 108th Division) pulling out of Arkansas as was mentioned in the canon - not with the JRTC and the men and equipment there still being in place

Last edited by Olefin; 09-30-2015 at 09:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2015, 01:12 PM
unkated unkated is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post
I'm all for "exotics" but, as far as I can tell, the Bison isn't a whole lot different that the LAV-25, already in service with the USMC and the T2K-era U.S. Army. Why would the DoD be looking at the Bison when both vehicles are based on the MOWAG Piranha? It's an intriguing mystery.
It isn't is much the Bison part as the MRTV at the end of the name: Mobile Repair Team Vehicle

(There's a bunch of sites I cannot look at during working hours due to limitations placed by my employer. However...)

From Paul's site: "The Bison MRTV is also fitted with 3 floodlights and outriggers and stabilizers for use during crane and winching operations."

However, there is a Press release titled 'Bison Mobile Repair team vehicle Deleivered to CF' dated 29-May-2009; this is perhaps a moot issue for T2K.

Uncle Ted
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-30-2015, 07:48 PM
swaghauler swaghauler is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 1,481
Default

It would be interesting to see what kind of "clandestine" armored vehicles would be in use by either US or Mexican forces in Texas. Texas Armoring of San Antonio always has a half dozen or so armored cars, and at least a couple of "civilian" up-armored vehicles for sale on their lot at any given time. I wonder who might be driving an armored BMW 5 Series, or Suburban SUV in Twilight?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-01-2015, 08:56 AM
Olefin Olefin is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Greencastle, PA
Posts: 3,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swaghauler View Post
It would be interesting to see what kind of "clandestine" armored vehicles would be in use by either US or Mexican forces in Texas. Texas Armoring of San Antonio always has a half dozen or so armored cars, and at least a couple of "civilian" up-armored vehicles for sale on their lot at any given time. I wonder who might be driving an armored BMW 5 Series, or Suburban SUV in Twilight?
would make a heck of a command car or recon vehicle

and could see the Family commanders down in Brownsville driving cars like that
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-01-2015, 09:34 PM
mpipes mpipes is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 290
Default

I don't see the US adopting the Bison or a variant. I think they would have gone with procuring LAV-25 variants to take advantage of the established logistics trail rather than trying to introduce a wholly new vehicle. Moreover, the LAV-25A1 is more heavily armed and armored.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2015, 07:49 PM
Adm.Lee Adm.Lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,386
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olefin View Post
However when you look at the dates the canon was written you can see why the JRTC isnt a factor in what is going on in the canon - it didnt go to Chafee in Arkansas until 1987 (after most of the original canon had been written) and not to Polk until 1993.

However you wonder if the JRTC would have been moved there with the 5th still there. In reality the 5th was deactivated in 1992 and thus the base was available for the JRTC to be moved there.

So given the 5th still being a going concern at the start of the war, would the JRTC still be at Fort Chafee? If so I dont see MilGov or CivGov (i.e. the 108th Division) pulling out of Arkansas as was mentioned in the canon - not with the JRTC and the men and equipment there still being in place
Given that JRTC is about learning to fight guerrillas somewhere, and 1996-97 sees the US Army faced with the Big War that it's institutionally REALLY wanted to fight since 1950, why would there still be a JRTC at all?

IMO, Polk would have been turned over to one of the basic training divisions that were cannibalized into LIDs.
__________________
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.