RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:38 AM
Adm.Lee Adm.Lee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,387
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by helbent4 View Post
further, if it's true that criminal elements will tend to be kept from the front lines they will be concentrated in the rear areas.
Given that, I might agree with you, then. I assumed the "criminal elements" would be posted to the infantry, as that's where the replacements are needed most. And I'm certain more than one officer or NCO saw them as more expendable than anyone else.

OTOH, the idea that women might be "safer" in the front lines might lead to more of them volunteering for that duty, which seems all kinds of weird to me, but if they can stick together, as I mentioned before, that seems to make some kind of sense.

Branching back to the drafted gang-members, I am reminded of something I read about in WWII. I'll look it up, and post more in a bit.
__________________
My Twilight claim to fame: I ran "Allegheny Uprising" at Allegheny College, spring of 1988.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2010, 05:12 PM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adm.Lee View Post
Given that, I might agree with you, then. I assumed the "criminal elements" would be posted to the infantry, as that's where the replacements are needed most. And I'm certain more than one officer or NCO saw them as more expendable than anyone else.

OTOH, the idea that women might be "safer" in the front lines might lead to more of them volunteering for that duty, which seems all kinds of weird to me, but if they can stick together, as I mentioned before, that seems to make some kind of sense.

Branching back to the drafted gang-members, I am reminded of something I read about in WWII. I'll look it up, and post more in a bit.
Adm.,

Probably there should be a clearer caveat. There would likely be some serious incidents of sexual assault, intimidation and discrimination as order and disciple breaks down. This would involve individuals or even groups, with possible subsequent retaliation. Not enough to derail the program (too much need for warm bodies at the sharp end) but enough to show there would be friction. Especially where there are bad characters with not enough supervision.

Criminals in uniform have always been a problem, of course. With the numbers of Americans that are in or have been through the corrections system, it's not hard to see why exceptions seem natural. I don't think we'd see "penal battalions" because it's foreign to our culture but the idea has some allure. I'm not surprised there was a definite criminal element present in WWII, with conscription the bad would be swept in with the good.

Quote:
FBI gang investigator Jennifer Simon said in an e-mail to Stars and Stripes this week [in Dec. 2006] that gang members have been documented on or near U.S. military bases in Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea and Iraq.

"It's no secret that gang members are prevalent in the armed forces, including internationally," Simon said, adding that the FBI is preparing to release a report on gangs in the military.

There are no official statistics on gang membership in the military, but some experts have estimated that 1 percent to 2 percent of the U.S. military are gang members, Simon said. That compares with just 0.02 percent of the U.S. population believed to be gang members, she wrote.

"Gang membership in the U.S. armed forces is disproportional to the U.S. population," she added.
http://libertystreetusa.blogspot.com...n-problem.html

An article in the NYT in 2008 put the number of recruits allowed to enlist through moral waivers for a criminal record at 1 in 10, some sources put it higher at 1 in 8. Mind you, these are just the recruits and not the US military as a whole, so proportionally the numbers are going to be lower overall. But still high, and likely to get higher as standards are lowered and conscription becomes universal.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2010, 05:32 PM
pmulcahy11b's Avatar
pmulcahy11b pmulcahy11b is offline
The Stat Guy
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,354
Default

As far as drafting/recruiting gang members:

For sure, there are some where the military is about training with weapons and tactics and bringing them back to their homies, while developing some contacts for their criminal activities such as drugs worldwide.

But there are some for whom the military represents the way out of poverty and the gangs that they are so desperately looking for. Yes, there may be some personality issues to deal with due to their upbringing, and they may have some ugly artwork on their bodies (tattoo removal for them should be fully funded and encouraged), but for some gang members, the military is a way out of the crappy lives they are living. There may not be as many problems with them as one might think.

Of course, with a draft, you'll get more bad apples.
__________________
I'm guided by the beauty of our weapons...First We Take Manhattan, Jennifer Warnes

Entirely too much T2K stuff here: www.pmulcahy.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2010, 06:12 PM
helbent4's Avatar
helbent4 helbent4 is offline
Volunteer Timeline Errata Coord.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmulcahy11b View Post
But there are some for whom the military represents the way out of poverty and the gangs that they are so desperately looking for. Yes, there may be some personality issues to deal with due to their upbringing, and they may have some ugly artwork on their bodies (tattoo removal for them should be fully funded and encouraged), but for some gang members, the military is a way out of the crappy lives they are living. There may not be as many problems with them as one might think.
Paul,

That's a good point and something I considered. Not all gang members are completely in the "thug life" that they can't be set straight, some just didn't have a real choice in life. So of course, not all can be tarred with the same brush!

I think part of why "rehab via military" works is that gang members and other criminals are given opportunities they didn't have before, and (more importantly) are removed from their old lives and separated from old "bad" friends. Presumably, the gang-bangers who are currently allowed to enlist don't have serious drug or violent crime charges, aren't alcoholics or drug addtics, etc. Problems will happen when the "bad apples" grow in proportion, and they can remind and reinforce the thug life mentality. Plus, conscripts will have less invested in their future and the opportunities the military allows, thus less reason to change and buy into the program.

Tony
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-21-2010, 06:40 PM
natehale1971's Avatar
natehale1971 natehale1971 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Monroe, NC, USA
Posts: 1,199
Send a message via AIM to natehale1971 Send a message via MSN to natehale1971 Send a message via Yahoo to natehale1971
Default

Actually i've got a good use for 'Penal Battalions'...

Helping with labor intensive jobs. be it disaster cleanup, fire-fighting, and helping with farming. These three things are JUST three that we have convict labor being used for here in the US today.

the use of "Penal Battalions" in the Army would be to assign them to Combat Engineers and other Rear Areas (under the watchful eyes of Military Police & the Corps of Engineers) for the construction of fortifications and cantonments, with helping in the recovery efforts and the like. The only downside to this overseas, would be the bad PR if some of these criminal element falls back to their old ways and starts raping and killing the people we're trying to help. But that can be said of regular troopers as well (as we saw with Belgium's peacekeepers to a UN Mission to Africa).

Which brings me to this point... What would such a program be called? we already have a name for women in combat, but wwhat of the penal battalions? what would politicians call something like that?
__________________
Fuck being a hero. Do you know what you get for being a hero? Nothing! You get shot at. You get a little pat on the back, blah blah blah, attaboy! You get divorced... Your wife can't remember your last name, your kids don't want to talk to you... You get to eat a lot of meals by yourself. Trust me kid, nobody wants to be that guy. I do this because there is nobody else to do it right now. Believe me if there was somebody else to do it, I would let them do it. There's not, so I'm doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2010, 02:21 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by helbent4 View Post
I think part of why "rehab via military" works is that gang members and other criminals are given opportunities they didn't have before, and (more importantly) are removed from their old lives and separated from old "bad" friends. Presumably, the gang-bangers who are currently allowed to enlist don't have serious drug or violent crime charges, aren't alcoholics or drug addtics, etc. Problems will happen when the "bad apples" grow in proportion, and they can remind and reinforce the thug life mentality. Plus, conscripts will have less invested in their future and the opportunities the military allows, thus less reason to change and buy into the program.
If only this was always true. I've heard horror stories of gangs operating within the military and/or using it as a training course for all kinds of skills put to illegal use in the outside world.

During this decade, as demand for warm bodies grew, and the U.S. armed forces fell short of their recruiting goals, the military lowered its standards for new recruits and started accepting people with criminal records and/or that would have been rejected because of mental and physical health issues. In some cases, this has had disastrous results. I can see this happening in the Twilight World, too.
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2010, 02:22 PM
Fusilier Fusilier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bangkok (I'm Canadian)
Posts: 568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raellus View Post
...started accepting people with criminal records and/or that would have been rejected because of mental and physical health issues. I can see this happening in the Twilight World, too.
Enter Varis Babicevs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2010, 02:26 PM
Raellus's Avatar
Raellus Raellus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Southern AZ
Posts: 4,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fusilier View Post
Enter Varis Babicevs
Exactly my point!
__________________
Author of Twilight 2000 adventure modules, Rook's Gambit and The Poisoned Chalice, the campaign sourcebook, Korean Peninsula, the gear-book, Baltic Boats, and the co-author of Tara Romaneasca, a campaign sourcebook for Romania, all available for purchase on DriveThruRPG:

https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...--Rooks-Gambit
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...ula-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...nia-Sourcebook
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/product...liate_id=61048
https://preview.drivethrurpg.com/en/...-waters-module
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.