![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I go National-Regional-Group-Team.
Group kinda/sorta covers (roughly) a state. I run groups for major cities or key resources and then groups that cover the rural areas. At the regional level, you see power teams, larger science teams, commo teams, medical teams as well as the depot teams, you will also MARS and recon teams, MARS to protect the specialists and recon teams that are larger and lighter than normal and intended for LRRP missions. Groups vary wildly from 2-5 teams to a 75 team group that covers the LA-San Diego metroplex. LOL, in other words groups are a work in progress. One of my buddies works for FEMA and we have been running weekend skull sessions, nit picking the Project. He actually considers the concept workable. More on that later.
__________________
The reason that the American Army does so well in wartime, is that war is chaos, and the American Army practices chaos on a daily basis. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*: under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. **: Each Region has 6 Areas, plus Alaska is a separate Area Command that reports directly to Prime Base. ***: 5 per Area, with Hawaii as a separate Group reporting direct to Prime Base. ****: On my to do list is to figure out some kind of scaling factor that accounts for the fact that some people will require heavier Project staffing. For example, Wyoming may require more Project members per capita simply because they are so spread out. Conversely, an inhabited city may ALSO require more staff because of higher hazards. The reason I have not delved into this is because it may be more than I can casually address. |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|