RPG Forums

Go Back   RPG Forums > Role Playing Game Section > Twilight 2000 Forum
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-14-2016, 04:32 PM
Silent Hunter UK Silent Hunter UK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 374
Default Missile flight times and warnings

Spinning off from another thread.

Here's the ones I know.

ICBM, US to USSR or vice versa: 25-30 mins
Pershing II, West Germany to Western USSR: c.10 mins
Scud missile: 3-5 minutes
UK BMEWS early warning time: 4.5 minutes (the 'four minute warning').
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2016, 02:05 AM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Not exactly a lot of time is it.
I wonder if the shorter ranged missiles with shorter flight times would have been launched at the same time as the ICBMs (thereby potentially giving an earlier warning of attack), or held off until a little later?
There's pros and cons for both approaches I think.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-23-2016, 04:37 PM
Silent Hunter UK Silent Hunter UK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Legbreaker View Post
Not exactly a lot of time is it.
I wonder if the shorter ranged missiles with shorter flight times would have been launched at the same time as the ICBMs (thereby potentially giving an earlier warning of attack), or held off until a little later?
There's pros and cons for both approaches I think.
That's why the Vulcans were designed to be able to take off within two minutes if the crew were on board, Blue Streak got axed and we ultimately bought Polaris then Trident; an undersea deterrent was and is by far the most survivable.

As for the missile launches, I'd imagine SIOP, the Soviet equivalent and their modern successors probably have options for both same time and held off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2016, 08:57 PM
Matt Wiser Matt Wiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Auberry, CA
Posts: 1,002
Default

For SLBMs off the East or West Coasts of the U.S., it was estimated six to 12 minutes' depending on where the missile subs were patrolling.
__________________
Treat everyone you meet with kindness and respect, but always have a plan to kill them.

Old USMC Adage
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-24-2016, 04:20 PM
Jason Weiser's Avatar
Jason Weiser Jason Weiser is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 455
Default

Or less than 5 minutes with a depressed trajectory shot.
__________________
Author of "Distant Winds of a Forgotten World" available now as part of the Cannon Publishing Military Sci-Fi / Fantasy Anthology: Spring 2019 (Cannon Publishing Military Anthology Book 1)

"Red Star, Burning Streets" by Cavalier Books, 2020

https://epochxp.tumblr.com/ - EpochXperience - Contributing Blogger since October 2020. (A Division of SJR Consulting).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2016, 12:25 AM
raketenjagdpanzer's Avatar
raketenjagdpanzer raketenjagdpanzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,261
Default

It's the waiting that'd make it awful. If I was at a primary site (I probably am anyway living in the Orlando area), assuming it was just an ICBM strike and not SLBMs, that 24-30 minute wait would just be ... horrible.
__________________
THIS IS MY SIG, HERE IT IS.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2016, 12:31 PM
unkated unkated is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raketenjagdpanzer View Post
It's the waiting that'd make it awful. If I was at a primary site (I probably am anyway living in the Orlando area), assuming it was just an ICBM strike and not SLBMs, that 24-30 minute wait would just be ... horrible.
I grew up on Long Island, east of New York City. I lived within 5 miles of where
the F14 and the F111 were being built.

The only way for the mass of population to get off Long Island is through New York City.

When I was 12, I figured out that they would not bother telling us. Where could we (serveral million of us) go in half an hour?

Uncle Ted
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-25-2016, 10:06 PM
Legbreaker's Avatar
Legbreaker Legbreaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 5,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unkated View Post
Where could we (serveral million of us) go in half an hour?
Down into your bomb shelters? Really about the only option available besides sitting out on the deck with the sunglasses and factor 50,000 sunscreen.
__________________
If it moves, shoot it, if not push it, if it still doesn't move, use explosives.

Nothing happens in isolation - it's called "the butterfly effect"

Mors ante pudorem
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2016, 04:14 PM
Silent Hunter UK Silent Hunter UK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 374
Default

If you didn't have one, it would be under the table. Or huddle together as a family and if need be, pray.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-30-2016, 04:37 PM
adimar adimar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default Pre-launched nuclear weapons

There were persistent rumors that the soviet union had launched a couple of satellites containing nuclear weapons.
These satellites were designed to be a first strike weapon vs key targets in the united states. The most important benefit is that their "launch" would not be detected by the standard launch detection systems and could potential strike withing 2-3 minutes of the go signal (assuming the attack was times to coincide with the optimal orbital position).

Adi
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-30-2016, 04:42 PM
Silent Hunter UK Silent Hunter UK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adimar View Post
There were persistent rumors that the soviet union had launched a couple of satellites containing nuclear weapons.
These satellites were designed to be a first strike weapon vs key targets in the united states. The most important benefit is that their "launch" would not be detected by the standard launch detection systems and could potential strike withing 2-3 minutes of the go signal (assuming the attack was times to coincide with the optimal orbital position).

Adi
The US would be able to track them however; their orbital surveillance is far better than the USSR's ever was.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-30-2016, 06:19 PM
adimar adimar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent Hunter UK View Post
The US would be able to track them however; their orbital surveillance is far better than the USSR's ever was.
The us would absolutely track them , but warning time would only be approx 2 minutes. And this assumes they wouldn't maneuver.
I very much doubt (though have no information to disprove) that tracking was continuous. It is far more likely orbit would be calculated with periodic checks.
If object-X a soviet "weather satellite" would not appear in it's expected trajectory. I don't think it will trigger a preemptive strike by the us even if it was known to be a pre-launched weapon. Thus leaving the us open to surprise attack.

Adi
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.