T2K Today: Korea

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by Dogger

I don't doubt the NK's will fight should it come to that, I think they'll be much more aggressive than the Iraqi's turned out to be in GWI...but they're still a conscripted army from a dirt poor country that hasn't seen combat in 50+ years, where as the US military is chuck full of combat veterans ATM.

Six thousand men and 21,000 artillery pieces is pretty daunting though.

[Dogger]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Six thousand men and 21,000 artillery pieces is pretty daunting though.

Agreed, and they will probably pound Seoul into the ground at the onset. However, the location of a lot of those guns is well known and no doubt first on the target list.

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by Dogger

Agreed, and they will probably pound Seoul into the ground at the onset. However, the location of a lot of those guns is well known and no doubt first on the target list.

Yeah, but the 2nd ID Commander, MG Tucker, is still pretty concerned about them. I was privileged to sit through a two hour briefing he gave about two weeks ago.

[HorseSoldier]

Weaponized Smallpox?

Slate wiper if they can pop it in enough places to prevent firewalling it.

I'd guess that if small pox broke out among Chinese or Russian troops at the front, their parent governments would nuke them from along with reducing North Korea to glowing cinders.

Have it introduced in the midst of a Twilight nuclear exchange and the human race will simply die off until population density is too low to let it spread effectively. Then we'll just have endemic occasional outbreaks that take 10% here or 20% there in bad years.

I always wanted to run a T2K game where players were somewhere near-ish Central Asia (Iran, or maybe a Russian game set in the Rodina) where characters had to deal with some roving neo-nomads who got exposed to something nasty while looting a Soviet bioweapons lab and were now carrying Small Pox or genetically modified Plague or something equally foul.

[Abbott Shaull]

The location of Seoul has been the one downside for the South.

Yeah, the only reason the US 8th Army HQ, 2nd Infantry Division HQ, and one of the 2nd combat brigade with other US assets is support. I am sure the South Korea realizes that if the war goes hot again, that it will take a long time for the US to move reinforcements into the region if we could ever. The government in the South Korea on one hand realize that with the 8th US Army, 2nd Infantry Division HQ and the one combat brigade with other assets under the UN means if something starts they can hopefully get help from somewhere.

So I understand the 2nd Infantry Division Commander being concerned as he should be. He knows if the North starts shelling south, his units would be on the target list no matter how fast the South would be able to respond and silence them.

As for the port, I don't see Russia or China wanting to see the South Korea government in control of a new unified Korea. At this time they realize regardless who control the port, it will keep them honest with each other.

China and Russia don't trust each other, but they realize they can't fight each other. Much like China and the US economies, both side don't care for it, but realize there not much either can do without ramifications that either economy would collapse. It is use US cash that allow China to buy Russia Hardware.... Russia selling to China, even though they know the Chinese would use it against them if they had to, due to need cash....kinda of vicious cycle...

[Raellus]

Originally Posted by Abbott Shaull

As for the port, I don't see Russia or China wanting to see the South Korea government in control of a new unified Korea. At this time they realize regardless who control the port, it will keep them honest with each other.

Agreed. South Korea is already an economic powerhouse. I think China would view a unified Korea as an even more dangerous economic competitor. Yeah, it would take a decade or two for the South to pull the North up to something approaching solvency, but once it does, look out! I mean, West Germany/Germany did something very similar in just over a decade or so.

And don't make the mistake of underestimating the NK military. Yeah, it's probably more bark than it is bite but we made the mistake of underestimating it once and we almost got our asses kicked as a result. Even if the NKs lost the conventional war fairly quickly, if/when it went asymetric, we could end up pacifying/stabilizing the North for a very long time. Throw in NBC weapons at some point and it could get very, very ugly before it was all over.

[Nowhere Man 1966]

Originally Posted by Raellus

Agreed. South Korea is already an economic powerhouse. I think China would view a unified Korea as an even more dangerous economic competitor. Yeah, it would take a decade or two for the South to pull the North up to something approaching solvency, but once it does, look out! I mean, West Germany/Germany did something very similar in just over a decade or so.

And don't make the mistake of underestimating the NK military. Yeah, it's probably more bark than it is bite but we made the mistake of underestimating it once and we almost got our asses kicked as a result. Even if the NKs lost the conventional war fairly quickly, if/when it went asymetric, we could end up pacifying/stabilizing the North for a very long time. Throw in NBC weapons at some point and it could get very, very ugly before it was all over.

True, just look at the status of Hyundai and Kia cars now. Twenty years ago, they were the butt of jokes, not much better than a Yugo in most people's eyes, although I've talked to some people who said even the early 1990's models held up very well. Mom bought a new Hyundai in 2004 because it was affordable, they are an alternative to people who cannot afford the new American or Japanese cars.

Chuck

[headquarters]

Originally Posted by Eddie

Six thousand men and 21,000 artillery pieces is pretty daunting though.

Firstly -a preface - this is in part a political discussion so please consider that I offer my views in order to hear what others think about them -I dont write with intent to provoke .

To the case :

I am with Eddie on this one - they might have all sorts of WMDs for these arty pieces .Also they have Seoul in range .

A "Nork" ( love the name ) invasion of the South seemes really far fetched with todays situation.War can take other forms though , and the Norks are unpredictable .

Victory isnt assured imho- it depends on what the objectives are .

Was Gulf 1 a full victory ? Of course it was - but objectives had to be shifted from "kick out Saddam" to "liberate Kuwait and destroy his army - only" to attain this . The kicking out couldnt be done until Gulf 2.

I agree that the US and ROk forces are more than capable of winning a war outright- so the question will turn to -at what cost ?

I believe, for one ,at the price of Seoul, and 500 000 civillian South Koreans for starters .

Then as a second phase ,the massive airborne retaliation will probably kill
100 000 NK service personel ( pulling numbers out of a hat here guys) and God knows what the collateral damage list will read like.

I cant really back it up with hard facts right now, but I have a chilling sensation down my spine that the NORKS arent going to be bowled over the same way the Iraqis were.
For one ,their nationalism goes further back and is more homogenous and hardcore than the composite Iraqi nation .They seem much more hard core-if poor and underequipped. Also I believe they have better organization and better training than the former Iraqi army .

A third phase would probably have to mean incursion onto NK soil . ( A lucky cruise missile hit might solve many problems to alleviate the need for this ,but I have read books from US service personel that have been to PyongYang before - the leadership has had bunkers that can stand up to some nuclear weapons for over 60 years .)
Such an operation/invasion opens up a whole can of new problems .

The western way of waging war has great strengths being the continuation of politics by other means ,as we are democracies and thus our causes are mostly just ,give or take a few -but its major weakness is this also . We cannot ( yes -lumping all of us together ) take the same casualties as the axis of evil guys .Our populace has no stomach for it .Support for the war will dwindle if death tolls rise and the match goes into overtime or if a rematch starts looming on the horizon .Further more - civillian casualties are also a similar concern ,also in the enemies population .

If my haphazard calculations have any merit than I see a death toll in total of around 1000 000 people ,mostly civillians that the Norks attack in Seoul and their own civvies that they will use as shields etc to try to null out US air superiority .A lot of dead NK service personell as well . I will not try to guesstimate at the number of ROK and US personell that will pay the ultimate price - I suspect the number to be staggering compared to the relatively low casualty number from the two Gulf wars -not counting the ongoing operations since 2003.

Thus - considering the risks and the potential costs, I dont think PyongYang could be "defeated" today - if you take their objective as a POV - to stay in power at any cost .Sort of like the Japanese strategy for the battle of Iwo Jima. Make it as costly as possible , and hope this will lead to the possibility for brokering a deal.Sure ,they would loose their huge army ,countless civillians would die and devestation would by all around .But if they could get the ROK and the US to back off, they could stay in control through harsh internal security measures and by more time for the Juche.

As I said in the preface -just one guys opinion.

[Fusilier]

Originally Posted by headquarters

Also I believe they have better organization and better training than the former Iraqi army.

Quite. Especially their (huge) special forces.

One only has to look at previous spec ops missions the Norks pulled in the south. They fought very hard, very well, and chose death rather than surrender in most cases. Granted it doesn't give any real indication to the rest of their forces, but I still wouldn't put them in the same category as the Iraqis - too many differences.

For one, they are poor yes, but they aren't motivated or fueled by money. Their ideology (juche and what not) is planted deep in all of them from birth. I recommend downloading one of the many investigative documentaries filmed in North Korea on that subject. It's surreal. The whole country is like one big insane asylum. Saying they are brainwashed is just barely scrapping the surface of what goes on there.

[Eddie]

Originally Posted by Fusilier

Quite. Especially their (huge) special forces.

Another concern of MG Tucker's. According to him (and he gets better intel updates than I do), it's apparently the largest group of special operations forces in the world.

[Abbott Shaull]

North Korea Special Operation troops have been conducting probes for many years. Strangely Korea is one of the few places where each side conduct several probes with their unit on scale that would be on par with the Cold War with US and Soviet would do, sometimes leaving signs they were there just to prove they were, while most of the time, the other side doesn't have a clue they are their.

One of several reason why North Korea being able to make Nuke is so annoying, bother me so much at times. More so than the missiles they have tested, these are window dressing that suppose to draw attention away. If they can make a "suitcase" and slip in into the South during one of these probes... Arm a sleeper cell their some target they wouldn't have to take out in the initial hours...Just let the sleeper cell take them out with the nuke...

[pmulcahy11b]

Originally Posted by Fusilier

Quite. Especially their (huge) special forces.

Yes, they have a lot of troops that they designate "special operations" troops. For the most part, though -- and I'm not letting any classified cat out of the bag here -- their "special operations troops" are simply well-trained infantry with additional training in infiltration and rear-area ops, similar to US light infantry forces. Most of their "special ops" troops are simply light fighters, in essence.

[Raellus]

Some possible scenarios leading up to another shooting war between the Koreas.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/2010052...08599199192800

[Targan]

I think MacArthur was right. Should have nuked the bastards. I can't believe that such a kooky family has managed to maintain a cult of personality for so long, keeping the majority of the North Korean population in abject poverty along the way. Its a pity the US is stretched so thin militarilly. I'd like to see the US and its allies (including Australia) roll on into North Korea and implement regime change with extreme prejudice.

[Caradhras]

For info guys...

The word 'Norks' is UK slang for, well, "What a great pair of norks!". You get the picture